This price was set by the publisher.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
By pressing ‘Send link’, you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message and data rates may apply.
Follow the Author
Rebooting AI: Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust Kindle Edition
The best device for reading, full stop. Learn more
--Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University, and the author of How the Mind Works and The Stuff of Thought "Finally, a book that tells us what AI is, what AI is not, and what AI could become if only we are ambitious and creative enough. No matter how smart and useful our intelligent machines are today, they don't know what really matters. Rebooting AI dares to imagine machine minds that goes far beyond the closed systems of games and movie recommendations to become real partners in every aspect of our lives."
--Garry Kasparov, Former World Chess Champion and author of Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins "Finally, a book that says aloud what so many AI experts are really thinking. Every CEO should read it, and everyone else at the company, too. Then they'll be able to separate the AI wheat from the chaff, and know where we are, how far we have to go, and how to get there."
--Pedro Domingos, Professor of computer science at the University of Washington and author of The Master Algorithm "A welcome antidote to the hype that has engulfed AI over the past decade and a realistic look at how far AI and robotics still have to go."
--Rodney Brooks, former director of the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
"AI is achieving superhuman performance in many narrow applications, but the reality is that we are still very far from artificial general intelligence that truly understands the world. Marcus and Davis explain the pitfalls of current approaches with humor and insight, and provide a compelling path toward the kind of robust AI that can earn our trust."
--Erik Brynjolfsson, Professor at MIT and co-author of The Second Machine Age and Machine Platform Crowd
"Rebooting AI is a blast to read. It's erudite, it's witty, and it neatly unpacks why today's AI has such trouble doing truly smart tasks--and what it'll take to reach that goal."
--Clive Thompson, Wired magazine columnist and author of Coders: The Making of a New Tribe and the Remaking of the World
"Will machines overtake humans in the foreseeable future, or is it just hype? Marcus and Davis lay out their answer with elegant prose and a sure quill, drawing the distinction between today's deep-learning based narrow, brittle artificial "intelligence" and the ever-elusive artificial general intelligence. Common sense and trust, which are intrinsically human, emerge as grand challenges for the field. If you plan to read one book to keep up with AI--this is an outstanding choice!"
--Oren Etzioni, CEO of Allen institute for AI & Professor of computer science at University of Washington.
"Artificial intelligence is here to stay. What are its achievements, its prospects, its pitfalls and misdirected initiatives--and how might these be remedied and overcome? This lucid and deeply informed account, from a critical but sympathetic perspective, is a valuable guide to developments that will surely have a major impact on the social order and intellectual culture."
"When I was a child I saw 2001: A Space Odyssey and then read everything I could about AI. All the smart people said it was twenty years away. Twenty years later I was an adult and the smart people said that AI was twenty years away. Twenty years after that we passed 2001 and the smart people said it was about twenty years away. Yup, it's getting better and better, but it still ain't HAL. It can tag photos pretty good but on understanding stories my son passed all the AI before he went to his stupid preschool. Now is the time to listen to smarter people: in Rebooting AI, Gary Marcus and Ernest Davis do a great job separating truth from bullshit to understand why we might not have real A.I. in twenty years and what we can do to get way closer."
--Penn Jillette, Emmy-winning magician and actor and New York Times best-belling author
"A must-read for anyone who cares about the future of artificial intelligence, filled with masterful storytelling and clear and easy-to-digest examples. Simultaneously puncturing hype and plotting a new course towards toward truly successful AI, Rebooting AI offers the first rational look at what AI can and can't do, and what it will take to build AI that we can genuinely trust. And it does it in a way that engages the reader and ultimately celebrates both what AI has accomplished and the strengths and power of the human mind."
--Annie Duke, best-selling author of Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don't Have All the Facts --This text refers to the paperback edition.
- ASIN : B07MYLGQLB
- Publisher : Vintage (10 September 2019)
- Language : English
- File size : 18879 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 290 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: 283,471 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
Review this product
Top reviews from other countries
This is not to say Marcus and Davis don’t have a point. They have and a good one indeed: the current cure-all in AI, Deep Learning, might be practically useful but is also clearly a dead end towards artificial “deep understanding” and trustworthy systems. This could have been laid out in a journal article though, it might not have needed a whole book.
If you’re new to the topic of AI and just have a general interest, this book could be for you. If you are an enthusiast already and want to widen your horizon it probably won’t do the job.
Insgesamt eine spannende Lektüre, die ich jedem AI-Interessierten ohne Einschränkung empfehlen kann.
The rhetoric existing in publications, announcements of new products, developments or research has messianic dyes according to G. Marcus. The problem is that the industry exaggerate the announcements, capabilities, functionalities and possibilities of AI. The truth is that the current AI has a very short and reduced scope. The tasks AI can do are very specific, within a delimited domain. The present AI is a kind of digital idiot savant, very capable in pattern detection but with zero understanding. AI cannot deal with a real world that is open, and that is not limited in specific contexts.
The book argues extensively and with many examples that Deep Learning is not the panacea to AI in the long term. Deep Learning has many limitations and it is not foreseeable that in the future it cannot be a solution to achieve strong AI. AI can only work with a large amount of data to learn and statistical algorithms to identify patterns. This restraint is becoming increasingly evident. G. Marcus proposes that you need to use cognitive architectures, using the concepts and research of classical AI, cognitive psychology and neurosciences.
G. Marcus details throughout the book, the difficulties of AI in linguistics and natural understanding of language. The examples are profuse, and sometimes repetitive. With just one example, it would be enough to capture the idea. Although the book is for the general people reading, I consider that some sections are a bit hard and repetitive, explaining the cognitive processes and semantic analysis of texts that are required for AI.
G. Marcus's summary and proposal to the current limitations of AI is that AI requires to use complex computational cognitive models and not just neural networks with pattern detection. Although G. Markus refers to several books and publications related to the subject, it seems to me that it would have been good to talk about research and advances in Computational Psychology (for example: The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology). G. Markus says that we need a new generation of AI researchers who know well and appreciate classical AI, machine learning and computer science more broadly, and take advantage of AI's historical knowledge base.
AI must evolve and reboot going from just recognizing patterns without understanding, to an understanding of what it perceives, to have common sense and to deal with causality. AI is, in general, on the wrong path, with limited intelligence for just narrow tasks, learned with big data and without deep understanding. G. Markus's proposal is to achieve an AI that has a) common sense, b) cognitive models, and c) reasoning.
However given the AI current limitation is worth to consider that AI is increasingly playing an important role that impact our daily lives, in the social, political, industrial, health and commercial realms. Undoubtedly AI is deeply transforming how we purchase, decide, socialize and care our health.
I think . REBOOTING AI is a good book that provides a critical review of the current development of AI. It provides a contrasting view of AI's current hype.
Today's AI system are quite "dumb" in its understanding of the world and work well in a very narrow set of environments like a chess or go game which are essentially limited by the number of cells in the environment. The computer which mastered GO games had to play over 30 million events to master the game and when the scope of game was even slightly altered it went back to square one.
Gary Marcus thus argues that AI system need to robust and resilient to manage everyday task. They argue AI needs to pick up a different direction which is not based on "huge data processing" but rather learning with unsupervised and unstructured data set .
The book is also in a way a celebration of human (thus all living beings) brain which quite unique in its ability to operate under a variety of circumstance with very little training
I have often said statistics is a shortcut to derive at an answer when there are too many variables and that's what deep learning is today, a massive shortcut.
Instead of programming robots from the ground up with intelligence, we use deep learning to find statistical correlations meaning robots often guess right but we don't understand when or why they will be wrong.
The authors don't aay deep learning is bad just that today people see it as the silver bullet when it's just a powerful tool in narrow AI that can fool people into thinking it has intelligence. For real AI, deep learning won't be enough or that important.
My personal opinion is narrow AI can still solve real problems like automated driving and many other cool things but I agree with the authors that it's not taking us closer to real artificial intelligence and deep learning is sort of a bad name. It should really be called something less grand like advanced correlation testing as to not pretend it's something it's not.