To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
I started reading with a suspicion the book would be excessively graphic in its description of violence. This fear was not substantiated. The story is gripping, the characters believable. As a fan of historic fiction its foundation in fact was a bonus. Yes, there is violence and sex but neither are used as a cheap device to titillate readers. Any fan of who-dunnits and historic fiction should give this a try.
It only took a few days to 'land' in my hands. A great book and Amazon description of the book has pushed me to purchase it. I enjoyed reading such a good book written in such a highly descriptive English.
4.0 out of 5 starscompletely revamps ideas about Machiavelli
Reviewed in the United States on 11 November 2018
Verified Purchase
The name Machiavelli and its related adjective, Machiavellian, summon up an image of clever, convoluted evil, gaining its ends through deception and manipulation of others. Many people therefore assume that Niccolo Machiavelli, who wrote The Prince, the book from which these ideas grew, was himself a person of this kind, or at least approved of such behavior. As this fictional mystery—and the history on which it is based, apparently—make clear, however, this was not the case. On the contrary, Machiavelli was a thoughtful, honest, and (at least as portrayed in this book) even kind individual, a serious student of political science. The description did, however, apparently fit the “Prince” he described, Cesare Borgia, here usually called by his nickname of Valentino—even if Borgia may not have been guilty of the exact crimes Ennis ascribes to him.
Most of the characters in this story are real historical figures, and they make quite a lineup: not only Machiavelli and Borgia, but Borgia’s father, Rodrigo, who became Pope Alexander VI, an all-powerful political figure in the Europe of his time; Leonardo da Vinci; and Damiata, the mistress of Rodrigo Borgia’s murdered son, Juan. Much less is known about Damiata than about the others, so she is fairly heavily fictionalized in the book. Damiata, Machiavelli, and Leonardo all have reasons to want to identify the murderer of a series of women whose remains are treated in a particularly complex and gruesome manner, and they work together to trace him and try to work out the reasons behind his bizarre actions.
The characters were appealing, and I enjoyed the interaction between Damiata, Machiavelli, and Leonardo, different as they were. The mystery was intriguing, though the most likely murderer was not very hard to guess; his motives, however, remained fairly obscure. I think my greatest pleasure, though, was learning more about Machiavelli and finding that he was not a villain after all, but merely the observer of one.