To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Oliver Stone At His Aggressive Best - Attempting To Rewrite American History And Doing It Successfully With A Clear And Clean Conscience!! I Loved The Film Mainly For The Screenplay And For The Film Editing Of Pietro Scalia!!
Un livre aussi intéressant pour la documentation autour du scénario que pour les critiques qui font les deux tiers de l'ouvrage et qui reflètent l'opinion des medias et de l'establishment à propos d'un film phare pour toute une génération.
I recall reading so many reviews about the movie, picking apart this or that re-created event--and using those nitpicks to discredit the work entirely. But reading this book, I find that the research that went into the film was thorough and impressive. I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist but, even now, there seem to be people who are eager to shut down the investigation rather than look into every dark corner. It's too late to ever know the whole truth, but shouldn't we keep open minds? Maybe Lee Harvey Oswald was part of a conspiracy, and maybe he wasn't. But, from what I've read here and elsewhere, it seems unlikely that he was the *sole* shooter.
Although, I did not read it personally (I purchased it as a gift), the lady I gave it to loved it. She has always been fascinated with the JFK and when I talked to her after Christmas, she spent an hour just telling me all about the book and how interesting it was. I really happy that my selection was such a big hit. LInda
Unfortunately outdated perhaps? While Oliver Stone made a magical rumor and supposition film believable with the help of master filmography and the use of very talented actors, the internet availability of assassination material tends to discredit this fine work. The late John Candy, a wonderful actor and comedian, was chosen to play the part of scumbag New Orleans lawyer Dean Andrews-it's an incredible performance. However, reading Dean's testimony in the Warren report(it's in volume 9-I think)the grand jury transcripts and the actual trial one senses that Candy's great performance is describing a totally different person. Dean lied over and over again to the Commission and since his lies fit the predetermined outcome they let it slide. He was of course convicted of perjury in Orleans Parrish. To base a conclusion on a truly dishonest man and convicted purger that business man Clay Shaw was the notorious Clay Bertrand, with the help of a sad drunk(again played masterfully by actor Jack Lemon) shows massive irresponsibility and slander. However, it made a great story! As much as I hate to say it this screenplay and movie needs a disclaimer proclaiming parts of it are based on pure speculation, and nothing more. Mr Shaw's daughter wrote several blistering, rant filled articles peppered with proclamations of her fathers misplaced connection to the assassination. I doubt that Mr. Stone ever read them-he should have as I believe her. What a travesty just to make a movie. The wonderful performance of veteran actor Donald Southerland as he mimicked (I guess) CIA spook Fletcher Prouty leaves the uninformed movie goer convinced this movie is the truth and nothing but the truth. It's not as even Mr Prouty relates in his own book about the CIA and the assassination.
Too bad so sad as I really liked this screenplay and movie.