Other Sellers on Amazon
$58.82
+ FREE Delivery
+ FREE Delivery
Sold by:
BuyGlobal
$38.48
+ $3.90 delivery
+ $3.90 delivery
Sold by:
Amazon US


Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
How Risky Is It, Really?: Why Our Fears Don't Always Match the Facts Hardcover – Illustrated, 17 February 2010
by
David Ropeik
(Author)
David Ropeik
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
Edition: 1st
See all formats and editions
Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
|
New from | Used from |
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial |
Hardcover, Illustrated
"Please retry"
|
$49.63
|
$38.48 | — |
$3.00 delivery: 17 - 25 May
Enhance your purchase
Save on selected Bestselling Children's books.
Includes Bluey, Peter Rabbit, Spot, Peppa Pig, Roald Dahl and more. Click to explore.
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
- Risk: A Practical Guide for Deciding What's Really Safe and What's Dangerous in the World Around YouROPEIK DAVIDPaperback
- Design and Deliver: Planning and Teaching Using Universal Design for LearningLoui NelsonPaperback
- The Premonition: A Pandemic StoryHardcover
- Outdoor Program Administration: Principles and PracticesGeoff HarrisonHardcover
- How to Eat: The Last Book on Food You'll Ever Need: All Your Food and Diet Questions AnsweredBITTMAN / KATZHardcover
- Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous ManMary L. Trump Ph.D.Hardcover
Start reading How Risky Is It, Really? on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Autumn Sale - Deals you don't want to miss
Discover deals on Books and more. Shop now
Product details
- Publisher : McGraw-Hill Education; 1st edition (17 February 2010)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0071629696
- ISBN-13 : 978-0071629690
- Dimensions : 16 x 2.29 x 23.37 cm
-
Best Sellers Rank:
652,239 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 654 in Cognitive Psychology Textbooks
- 1,575 in Leadership Training
- 3,219 in Emotional Mental Health
- Customer Reviews:
Product description
About the Author
David Ropeik is an international consultant and widely sought-after public speaker on risk perception and risk communication. Ropeik is an instructor at the Harvard University Extension School's Environmental Management Program and taught risk perception and risk communication at Harvard School of Public Heath (2000-2006). He was a commentator on risk for NPR Morning Edition program and has been a guest host for NPR's "The Connection." He has written articles about risk perception for The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, LA Times, and The Boston Globe, and Nova among others.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
- Antifragile: Things That Gain From DisorderPaperback
- Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our DecisionsPaperback
- The Art of Statistics: Learning from DataPaperback
- Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and HappinessPaperback
- The Failure of Risk Management: Why It's Broken and How to Fix ItHardcover
- Untamed: Stop Pleasing, Start Living: THE NO.1 SUNDAY TIMES BESTSELLERPaperback
Customer reviews
4.4 out of 5 stars
4.4 out of 5
61 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews from other countries

J Garstang
3.0 out of 5 stars
soft back please
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 27 September 2018Verified Purchase
not enough real life examples
Report abuse

MMurphy
5.0 out of 5 stars
Informative in these times
Reviewed in Japan on 25 May 2020Verified Purchase
Good reality check for those with anxiety.

Kindle Customer
3.0 out of 5 stars
Half a Book
Reviewed in the United States on 5 April 2020Verified Purchase
A very good discussion of the subtitle (why our fears don't always match the facts). A little weak in the "how risky is it really" .And for good reason. Because a person's reaction to risk is rarely based on "good reason" but rather on the welter of emotions that prove that whoever stuck the word "sapiens" on our species was either sorely mistaken or had an incredible sense of humor.
The book was a mostly enjoyable,informative read on risk PERCEPTION. And it makes the strong point that risk perception is more important than actual risk ,which is definitely the case as far as managing risk in the public arena goes. My 'spidey sense' starts tingling,however,when time after time what I feel are real risks are downplayed by the author. No,I do NOT know the specific risk of certain chemicals that get into the water system. But,as a recently retired physician in New Jersey ,the home of the Toxic Avenger , I do know that I cared for years for a patient who died of a cancer directly attributable to toxins around Pompton Lakes and plumes of chemicals that affected her water supply.And as I was reading this book i had the distinct feeling that the author was underemphasising risks.And underemphasising the power and political will of groups that have an economic stake in the field of risk perception. When an organization founded by the foundations of Scaife and Olin goes unidentified as a representative of the political Right, I have a problem with that.
I have read enough in this topic to understand that people are very poor Innate Statisticians. This was a pretty good presentation of how and why this is. And it was even pretty good at explaining why that fact is relatively unimportant.I think what put me off is that I felt that at a lot of points the author was explaining why people should be less suspicious of the chemical industry and the radiation industry and various other industries which, in my opinion ,if they were immune to financial penalties,would not bat an eye at poisoning our water supply or our air.Or kill my patient (whoa, he Personalized it so the event was more impactful!!And if I fabricated that she was only 4 years old,it would have been even MORE impactful! Cuz the victim would have been a CHILD ( which is Impact Gold) No,she was a grown-up.It was quite tragic enough,thank you. And all the people in that area should not be expected to have to work out a specific mathematical risk with a specific biochemical mechanism of injury before they are protected from potentially predatory financial interests that might poison them.
The book was a mostly enjoyable,informative read on risk PERCEPTION. And it makes the strong point that risk perception is more important than actual risk ,which is definitely the case as far as managing risk in the public arena goes. My 'spidey sense' starts tingling,however,when time after time what I feel are real risks are downplayed by the author. No,I do NOT know the specific risk of certain chemicals that get into the water system. But,as a recently retired physician in New Jersey ,the home of the Toxic Avenger , I do know that I cared for years for a patient who died of a cancer directly attributable to toxins around Pompton Lakes and plumes of chemicals that affected her water supply.And as I was reading this book i had the distinct feeling that the author was underemphasising risks.And underemphasising the power and political will of groups that have an economic stake in the field of risk perception. When an organization founded by the foundations of Scaife and Olin goes unidentified as a representative of the political Right, I have a problem with that.
I have read enough in this topic to understand that people are very poor Innate Statisticians. This was a pretty good presentation of how and why this is. And it was even pretty good at explaining why that fact is relatively unimportant.I think what put me off is that I felt that at a lot of points the author was explaining why people should be less suspicious of the chemical industry and the radiation industry and various other industries which, in my opinion ,if they were immune to financial penalties,would not bat an eye at poisoning our water supply or our air.Or kill my patient (whoa, he Personalized it so the event was more impactful!!And if I fabricated that she was only 4 years old,it would have been even MORE impactful! Cuz the victim would have been a CHILD ( which is Impact Gold) No,she was a grown-up.It was quite tragic enough,thank you. And all the people in that area should not be expected to have to work out a specific mathematical risk with a specific biochemical mechanism of injury before they are protected from potentially predatory financial interests that might poison them.
4 people found this helpful
Report abuse

Michael P
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great book especially considering the Corona Virus panic
Reviewed in the United States on 15 March 2020Verified Purchase
The author ties together a lot of relevant psychology, sociology and cognitive science into an easy to read book on both the causes of our fear biases and things we can do to live in a world with danger while avoiding anxiety and actually being safer AND achieving the improvements we want.
His work aligns well with the studies of other heavy weights like Antonio Damasio, Jonathan Haidt, etc.
His work aligns well with the studies of other heavy weights like Antonio Damasio, Jonathan Haidt, etc.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse

David J. Aldous
5.0 out of 5 stars
Lively analysis of the misperception of risks
Reviewed in the United States on 5 June 2011Verified Purchase
This book focuses on the psychology of how we perceive risk, complementing an earlier book
Risk: A Practical Guide for Deciding What's Really Safe and What's Really Dangerous in the World Around You
giving hard data on what is actually risky. The author, who lectures on risk communication, knows how to hold an audience's attention, and succeeds admirably in conveying serious content in popular style and language. To me, the central feature is a list of 13 factors which can make a risk seem more threatening or less threatening than it really is (Trust; Risk vs benefit; Control; Choice; Natural vs human-made; Pain and suffering; Uncertainty; Catastrophic vs chronic; Can it happen to me? New vs familiar? Risks to children; Personification; Fairness). Also noteworthy is his discussion of the role of the media in making the world seem scarier than it really is -- a well-informed discussion, because the author worked as a TV reporter for 20+ years.
The book points out how the "perception gap" can be harmful: individuals continue risky behavior unaware, while over-worrying about the
wrong things; public policy is shaped by self-interested or ideological pressure groups, or by public opinion driven by scaremongering media.
There are suggestions for you as an individual on how to identify and counteract these psychological risk factors. The book concludes with a
discussion of the public policy aspect of risk communication. It is hopeless to try to impose some purely rational cost-benefit analysis on
the public, rather one should start by taking these predictable psychological factors into account.
All these points are discussed via entertaining real examples. So the book deserves 5 stars for significant interesting content not readily
found elsewhere. My only quibble is that the people who will read this book are probably those predisposed to rational analysis, not the ones who might benefit most.
The book points out how the "perception gap" can be harmful: individuals continue risky behavior unaware, while over-worrying about the
wrong things; public policy is shaped by self-interested or ideological pressure groups, or by public opinion driven by scaremongering media.
There are suggestions for you as an individual on how to identify and counteract these psychological risk factors. The book concludes with a
discussion of the public policy aspect of risk communication. It is hopeless to try to impose some purely rational cost-benefit analysis on
the public, rather one should start by taking these predictable psychological factors into account.
All these points are discussed via entertaining real examples. So the book deserves 5 stars for significant interesting content not readily
found elsewhere. My only quibble is that the people who will read this book are probably those predisposed to rational analysis, not the ones who might benefit most.
34 people found this helpful
Report abuse