Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
By pressing ‘Send link’, you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message and data rates may apply.
Fools, Frauds and Firebrands: Thinkers of the New Left Paperback – International Edition, 8 September 2016
Caustic, highly recherché, and simply great fun to read for the questing intellectual soul. (Kirkus Reviews)
From the standpoint of a serious conservatism, it honestly assesses the political and philosophical contributions of the Left. The book also addresses what is likely our most pressing question: 'Can there be any foundation for resistance to the leftist agenda without religious faith?' (Catholic World Report)
Since he no longer has a university career to protect, Scruton can now tweak the nose of academic leftism to his heart's content. Scruton is at his best, (and funniest) when trying to make sense of [Alain] Badiou's weird confection historical materialism and Platonic mathematical theory (Jonathan Derbyshire Prospect)
The book is a masterpiece ... In crisp, sometimes brilliant prose, Mr. Scruton considers scores of works in three languages, giving the reader an understanding of each thinker's overarching aim and his place within the multifaceted movement known as the New Left. He neither ridicules nor abuses the writers he considers; he patiently deconstructs them, first explaining their work in terms they themselves would recognize and then laying bare their warped assumptions and empty pretensions. (Barton Swaim Wall Street Journal)
I enjoyed this immensely, both for Scruton's dry, British wit as well as for the sheer breadth of intellectuals covered in his survey (Against the Grain Blog)
Highly recommended (Powerline US Blog)
Here Scruton thoroughly and fairly debunks the ostentation, obfuscation, and terrible writing and downright deceitfulness of much of postwar Marxist-inspired philosophy. For Scruton the culprits are mainly from France and Germany-beginning with Sartre and carrying through to Foucault, Habermas, Althusser, Lacan, Deleuze, Gramsci, and Said-and he carries the attack forward to Badiou and Zizek. Even Galbraith and Dworkin take a few hits. Scruton writes from the perspective of an old-school conservative. His sympathies are with the virtues of the countryside and historically rooted associations of every sort, from churches and the US Constitution to volunteer fire departments, brass bands, and the local Grange. His personal point of view could be called sentimental . but his arguments against his foes are substantial and deep. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty. (CHOICE)
- ASIN : 1472935950
- Publisher : Bloomsbury Continuum; 1st edition (8 September 2016)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 304 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9781472935953
- ISBN-13 : 978-1472935953
- Dimensions : 13.64 x 2.31 x 21.34 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 320,909 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Review this product
Top reviews from Australia
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Top reviews from other countries
That said, the reason that I have given three stars is that I am a psychotherapist and am well acquainted with Lacan, Deleuze, Guattari and Zizek who Scruton dismisses summarily in the book. I found these to be incredibly weak sections with a minimal understanding shown of the conceptual edifices that he was proposing to criticise. I can understand why someone could not be bothered to go through the difficult process of gaining a working knowledge of Lacan or Deleuze but if you are unable to devote the time to understand it, do not try and excuse your failure as a inherent fault of the theorist. There are plenty of writers now who make these works accessible, such as Bruce Fink etc. and these show that Scruton's dismissals are largely the result of his own lack of comprehension.
I get the feeling that he is much better acquainted with the more traditionally Marxist theorists and the book flounders when trying to deal with the more psychoanalytic targets. I also find it disingenuous when Scruton takes a paragraph of text and prints it out of context as a means of showing how unintelligible the theorist is - surely someone could do similar with Kant, Hegel etc.
Overall though I did enjoy this offering and the writing style is very readable.
He found himself shunned by the mainstream left wing academia in the West whilst welcomed by academia in Eastern Europe where the ideals of the New Left were actually put into practice. If for no other reason, whatever side of the political spectrum, readers ought to take up the challenge that Scruton sets forth in this challenging book. In effect, respect those with genuine views even though you may disagree. Having said that, academics have a long tradition of sharpening the mighty pen to reveal the flaw in another’s arguments. Long may that continue.