
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Divinity of Doubt: The God Question Paperback – 12 April 2011
by
Vincent Bugliosi
(Author)
Vincent Bugliosi
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
See all formats and editions
Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price
|
New from | Used from |
Hardcover, Bargain Price
"Please retry"
|
$145.65 | — |
Paperback, 12 April 2011 |
$40.85
|
$40.85 | — |
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$43.95 | — |
$4.95 delivery: 19 - 26 March
Releases March 2, 2021. Pre-order Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life now with Pre-order Price Guarantee.
If the Amazon.com.au price decreases between your order time and the end of the day of the release date, you'll receive the lowest price. Order now
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
I’d like to read this book on Kindle
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Save up to 50% off RRP on select top books
PLUS, free expedited delivery. T&C's apply. See more
Product details
- Publisher : Vanguard Pr; 1st edition (12 April 2011)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 338 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1593156294
- ISBN-13 : 978-1593156299
- Dimensions : 16.51 x 3.18 x 24.13 cm
- Customer Reviews:
Product description
About the Author
Vincent Bugliosi received his law degree in 1964. In his career at the L.A. County District Attorney's office, he successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials, including 21 murder convictions without a single loss. His most famous trial, the Charles Manson case, became the basis of his classic, Helter Skelter, the biggest selling true-crime book in publishing history. Two of Bugliosi's other books--And the Sea Will Tell andOutrage--also reached #1 on the New York Times hardcover bestseller list. No other American true-crime writer has ever had more than one book that achieved this ranking.The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder was likewise a New York Times bestseller, andReclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy has been heralded as epic and a book for the ages. HBO, in association with Tom Hanks's PlayTone Productions, will be producing this as a ten-hour mini-series.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customer reviews
3.7 out of 5 stars
3.7 out of 5
88 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews from other countries

Ken Blackwell
1.0 out of 5 stars
A very poor book written by someone with an agenda
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 27 March 2016Verified Purchase
A terrible book written by an agnostic with an agenda. He clearly is no theologian and has got many things wrong. One example must suffice. He states early on that free will is not mentioned in the Bible and yet in the third chapter of Genesis Adam and Eve are given a free choice with regard to fruit on the tree in the garden. That is just one mistake and I could highlight many others. More research is needed to make this a theologically accurate book. Dr Ken Blackwell
Report abuse

James Cruickshank
1.0 out of 5 stars
Hardly worthy of the effort. The arguments are more lawyerly than scholarly.
Reviewed in Canada on 10 February 2014Verified Purchase
Bugliosi might pass as a great lawyer but he utterly failed to convince me that he knows anything about the mechanisms of evolution. His slagging of Richard Dawkins is problematic. An objective assessment of his work is one thing but Bugliosi takes cheap shots at every turn. He is using his legal background to sway the reader, not his logic. Sorry Vincent.

Bogus Tripper
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great book.
Reviewed in Canada on 16 April 2016Verified Purchase
Just what I wanted another unbeliever like me and not afraid to put it in writing for all the world to read. There is no GOD!

Caleb Birchler
4.0 out of 5 stars
Outstanding logic but...
Reviewed in the United States on 27 October 2011Verified Purchase
Overall, this book was absolutely phenomenal. I feel Bugliosi does an extrordinary job at examining various aspects of religion and atheism while presenting logical arguments and explainations throughout the book. I ended up giving it 4 stars for reasons explained below.
I think Bugliosi hits the nail on the head when talking about philiosophical evidence and a very solid thought process to establish significant doubt on all ends of the spectrum; thus justifying the title of this book. I think the read, as a whole, was, while being a bit wordy at times (as are many philosophical texts), very brilliant. I think he manages to address the major points of religious debate in a very precise fashion and presents it in a way that the reader can understand.
This being said, as many have written here, my one critique of the book is his lack of scientific knowledge. Granted, as others have demonstrated, he clearly says he does not understand, nor attempt to masquerade around as though he understands, the science pertaining to religious debates. However, herein lies the problem with presenting this argument and opening the so-called "Pandora's Box." Entire disciplines of science cover the topic of evolution, which is not a simple concept that can be accurately portrayed over the course of dinner or some short period of time. It proves even difficult to broadly skim over the subject, as a whole, over the course of a semester in a graduate level class. This would be even more difficult to describe to an individual with admittedly minimal scientific knowledge.
For example, say I were to debate Einstein's Theory of Relativity. I would feel entirely inadequate to even address the complex issue of Relativity (ie. Evolution) if I did not have the grasp Algebra (equivalent to basic scientific knowledge), much less Calculus (in this case, biochemistry and biology).
In addition to this, as stated, his logic is very sound. Logicical analysis of theology is simply that, examination of the written word and interpreting the written and implied word as best as possible while practicing critical thinking and maintaining a sound, observable train of thought. When we talk about science, it becomes incredibly difficult to dispute (or in his case, essentially omit) evidenciary support and maintain a degree of logic in the discussion. Again, back to the Relativity issue, I may dispute that E does in fact equal mc^2 because I do not think that it is equal to the constant of light squared, that the concept of this exponential relationship does not make any logical sense to me. However, the explaination of this phenomonea is demonstrated through a degree of high mathmatical calculations that even brilliant mathematicians would have difficulty coining on their own.
Ok, I'm realizing this is getting pretty damn long, so to cut it short... Great book. Great read. Definitely support the author's train of thought. Really, really, really wish he had educated himself more on the scientific issues... Had he done that, it would have been a 5 star review, without a doubt.
I think Bugliosi hits the nail on the head when talking about philiosophical evidence and a very solid thought process to establish significant doubt on all ends of the spectrum; thus justifying the title of this book. I think the read, as a whole, was, while being a bit wordy at times (as are many philosophical texts), very brilliant. I think he manages to address the major points of religious debate in a very precise fashion and presents it in a way that the reader can understand.
This being said, as many have written here, my one critique of the book is his lack of scientific knowledge. Granted, as others have demonstrated, he clearly says he does not understand, nor attempt to masquerade around as though he understands, the science pertaining to religious debates. However, herein lies the problem with presenting this argument and opening the so-called "Pandora's Box." Entire disciplines of science cover the topic of evolution, which is not a simple concept that can be accurately portrayed over the course of dinner or some short period of time. It proves even difficult to broadly skim over the subject, as a whole, over the course of a semester in a graduate level class. This would be even more difficult to describe to an individual with admittedly minimal scientific knowledge.
For example, say I were to debate Einstein's Theory of Relativity. I would feel entirely inadequate to even address the complex issue of Relativity (ie. Evolution) if I did not have the grasp Algebra (equivalent to basic scientific knowledge), much less Calculus (in this case, biochemistry and biology).
In addition to this, as stated, his logic is very sound. Logicical analysis of theology is simply that, examination of the written word and interpreting the written and implied word as best as possible while practicing critical thinking and maintaining a sound, observable train of thought. When we talk about science, it becomes incredibly difficult to dispute (or in his case, essentially omit) evidenciary support and maintain a degree of logic in the discussion. Again, back to the Relativity issue, I may dispute that E does in fact equal mc^2 because I do not think that it is equal to the constant of light squared, that the concept of this exponential relationship does not make any logical sense to me. However, the explaination of this phenomonea is demonstrated through a degree of high mathmatical calculations that even brilliant mathematicians would have difficulty coining on their own.
Ok, I'm realizing this is getting pretty damn long, so to cut it short... Great book. Great read. Definitely support the author's train of thought. Really, really, really wish he had educated himself more on the scientific issues... Had he done that, it would have been a 5 star review, without a doubt.
6 people found this helpful
Report abuse

hunter42
5.0 out of 5 stars
rational analysis of "the God Question"
Reviewed in the United States on 1 September 2013Verified Purchase
the book was an in depth analysis of the extremes of the faith systems relative to the existence and essence of the God entity from atheism to Catholicism and Protestant fundamentalism leading to the conclusion that the optimum ----and only---rational position to take on the question is that of agnosticism. contains an excellent analysis of manmade theologies as well as scriptural citations in support of various positions regarding divinities, heaven and hell, biblical interpretations, morality. the text supports the proposition that a generous portion of doubt is a healthy template for people of faith and that many tenets of major faiths cannot/do not survive legal profession protocols related to evidence, reason, and simple logic. some readers might take offense at some faith criticisms but the book remains a comprehensive analysis of one of humanities pressing inquiries with a brutal but even handed critique
One person found this helpful
Report abuse